
BOQ Classification
Scope, item, quantity, package, row value, comparable item logic, and procurement grouping are made readable before sourcing begins.
Build your tender on a deeper project study.
Study every BOQ item, its cost drivers, and its risks. Carry the reviewed requirements into RFQs, supplier and subcontractor comparison, approvals, and purchase-order preparation.
Built for project study, tendering, and informed construction decisions.
BOQ analysis, emails, supplier lists, quote sheets, messages, and approval notes often move in separate places. The result is repeated manual work, weak traceability, inconsistent assumptions, and procurement decisions that are harder to defend.
Upload your BOQ, bill of materials (BOM), specifications, supported drawings, and scope notes. Assign the project to the right team and check file details before starting the study.


Follow the structure behind a project study: scope, cost drivers, and the evidence that needs your review.
BOQ items, units, quantities, specifications, and related work define the project scope.
Interactive construction illustration.Study every BOQ item in context: quantity, unit rate, contribution to the total cost, materials, labor, equipment, productivity, and wastage. Review supporting work, dependencies, drawing conflicts, and risk allowances before you finalize the tender.

Scope, item, quantity, package, row value, comparable item logic, and procurement grouping are made readable before sourcing begins.

Material logic, labor exposure, equipment needs, wastage assumptions, collateral work, market signals where available, and confidence notes are structured for review.

Execution productivity, dependency exposure, drawing or scope gaps, supplier and subcontractor risks, and procurement risks are recorded before approval decisions.
Once the project study is reviewed, Quotah groups requirements into procurement packages and prepares RFQs with scope, quantities, technical context, deadlines, and response expectations. An approval gate appears before RFQs are launched.

Review technical fit, coverage, capability, compliance, availability, and response quality. Use the supporting evidence to build a shortlist; your team retains the final selection.


Commercial and technical responses can be compared against scope, quantities, gaps, exclusions, risks, readiness, and next action. High-risk commercial and contractual actions require human approval; Quotah structures the evidence but does not award.
Request Contractor DemoStudy the tender, structure requirements, evaluate supplier and subcontractor responses, and record approvals before preparing the decision for your own issuing process.

BOQ/BOM logic, scope structure, quantities, cost drivers, productivity, wastage, collateral work, and risk register.
Reviewed requirements become packages with scope, quantities, technical context, deadlines, and response expectations.
Participant fit, readiness, compliance, coverage, response quality, gaps, exclusions, quotation logic, and proposal context.
Human review, assumption validation, decision notes, approval readiness, and next action remain tied to the original project.
After verified approval, Quotah prepares PO-ready information. Legal issuance and signature remain through the customer's process or ERP.
Visibility over projects, departments, roles, limits, RFQs, comparison quality, decision readiness, and procurement progress.
Project creation, study, review, and sourcing remain linked to one decision record.

Set up the project, assign the responsible team, and add the scope and location before uploading documents.
Bring the selected supplier or subcontractor, scope, quantities, commercial terms, exclusions, risk notes, and approval references into a PO-ready summary. Final issuance and signature follow your company's authorized process.

Organize projects by company, branch, and department. Set responsibilities and approval limits, and keep a record of the reviews and decisions that move work forward.
Separate operating entities, branch contexts, and project ownership without losing the management view.
Tendering, procurement, engineering, QS, commercial, and management teams can have clear responsibilities.
Approval limits, validation steps, decision records, and activity history support accountability.
Follow project progress, RFQ responses, outstanding clarifications, and approvals so your team knows what needs attention.